The program of comprehensive personalized rehabilitation after surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: the results of a prospective randomized comparative study

Background. The problems of diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with endometrial cancer (EC) remain relevant for the entire medical community. Radical surgical intervention shows high efficiency among the existing methods of EC treatment. However, it causes many complications that require rehabilitation support for patients. The development of new instruments and protocols for rehabilitation of EC patients is necessary.

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive personalized rehabilitation program in patients after radical surgical EC treatment.

Material and methods. A prospective randomized comparative study included 61 patients with histologically verified stage IA endometrioid adenocarcinoma of high or moderate differentiation degree. The patients were divided into two groups: the group of “active” rehabilitation (n=29), and the group of “passive” rehabilitation (n=32). During 1 year, their physical, mental health and social engagement were assessed using questionnaires.

Results. The survey showed a low level of physical, functional, emotional and social well-being of EC patients at the first 3–7 days after surgery. After 12 months, a recovery in the quality of life of all participants was observed. However, patients undergoing “active” rehabilitation recovered significantly faster, and their quality of life was significantly higher compared to patients undergoing “passive” rehabilitation.

Conclusion. The obtained results indicate the effectiveness of a personalized approach in rehabilitation of EC patients. It is expected that its implementation will considerably reduce the incidence of complications and the burden on the healthcare system.

1. Oaknin A., Bosse T.J., Creutzberg C.L., et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022; 33 (9): 860–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009.

2. Cai Y., Wang B., Xu W., et al. Endometrial cancer: genetic, metabolic characteristics, therapeutic strategies and nanomedicine. Curr Med Chem. 2021; 28 (42): 8755–81. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867328666210705144456.

3. Crosbie E.J., Kitson S.J., McAlpine J.N., et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2022; 399 (10333): 1412–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00323-3.

4. Kiesel L., Eichbaum C., Baumeier A., Eichbaum M. Obesity epidemic – the underestimated risk of endometrial cancer. Cancers. 2020; 12 (12): 3860. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123860.

5. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71 (3): 209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

6. Ulrikh E.A., Tambieva Z.A., Urmancheeva A.F., Kutusheva G.F. The quantitative assessment of the health-related quality of life in patients with gynecological malignancy. Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Saint Petersburg. 2020; 1-2: 30–4 (in Russ.).

7. Son J., Carr C., Yao M., et al. Endometrial cancer in young women: prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in women aged ≤40 years. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020; 30 (5): 631–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001105.

8. Cianci S., Rosati A., Capozzi V.A., et al. Quality of life and sexual functioning of patient affected by endometrial cancer. Minerva Med. 2021; 112 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.20.07081-0.

9. Lee S.H., Lee N.R., Kim J.W., et al. Feasibility and acceptability of prehabilitation before surgery for endometrial cancer. Korean J Sports Med. 2020; 38 (2): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.5763/kjsm.2020.38.2.85.

10. Dronkers J.J., Chorus A.M.J., van Meeteren N.L.U., Hopman-Rock M. The association of pre-operative physical fitness and physical activity with outcome after scheduled major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2013; 68 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12066.

11. Snowden C.P., Prentis J.M., Anderson H.L., et al. Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts complications and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing major elective surgery. Ann Surg. 2010; 251 (3): 535–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf811d.

12. Onujiogu N., Johnson T., Seo S., et al. Survivors of endometrial cancer: who is at risk for sexual dysfunction? Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123 (2): 356–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.07.035.

13. Karataşlı V., Can B., Çakır İ., et al. Life quality of endometrioid endometrial cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 41 (4): 621–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1787969.

14. Gao H., Xiao M., Bai H., Zhang Z. Sexual function and quality of life among patients with endometrial cancer after surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017; 27 (3): 608–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000905.

15. Sanjida S., Kissane D., McPhail S.M., et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a longitudinal analysis from before surgery to 6-month post-surgery. J Psychosoc Oncol Res Pract. 2019; 1 (3): e13. https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000013.

16. Silver J.K., Baima J., Mayer R.S. Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: an essential component of quality care and survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63 (5): 295–317. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21186.

17. Sandzhieva L.N., Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., et al. Personalized comprehensive rehabilitation program after surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a prospective randomized comparative study. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2022; 16 (2): 143–57 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2022.318.

18. Zandbergen N., de Rooij B.H., Vos M.C., et al. Changes in health-related quality of life among gynecologic cancer survivors during the two years after initial treatment: a longitudinal analysis. Acta Oncol. 2019; 58 (5): 790–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1560498.

19. Wiegel M., Meston C., Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005; 31 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230590475206.

20. Zigmond A.S., Snaith R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67 (6): 361–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

21. FACT-En. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Endometrial. Available at: https://www.facit.org/measures/fact-en (accessed 04.05.2023).

22. Solopova A.G., Idrisova L.E., Makatsariya A.D., et al. Multidisciplinary approach to medical rehabilitation of oncogynecologic patients. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2017; 11 (4): 57–67 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347.2017.11.4.057-067.

23. Wu X., Liu Y., Zhu D., et al. Early prevention of complex decongestive therapy and rehabilitation exercise for prevention of lower extremity lymphedema after operation of gynecologic cancer. Asian J Surg. 2021; 44 (1): 111–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.022.

24. Miralpeix E., Fabregó B., Rodriguez-Cosmen C., et al. Prehabilitation in an ERAS program for endometrial cancer patients: impact on postoperative recovery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023; 33 (4): 528–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2022-004130.

25. Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., Begovich E., et al. Neurological disorders after hysterectomy: from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations. Epilepsia i paroksizmal'nye sostoania / Epilepsy and Paroxysmal Conditions. 2022; 14 (1): 54–64 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2022.115.

26. Wood K.C., Bertram J., Kendig T., et al. Community-based outpatient cancer rehabilitation services for women with gynecologic cancer: acceptability and impact on patient-reported outcomes. Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30 (10): 8089–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07227-8.