Recovery following surgical decompression of the vertebral artery in Kimmerle anomaly: challenges and solutions

Background. Recovery challenges in patients following cervical spine surgery, particularly vertebral artery decompression in Kimmerle anomaly, are of great scientific and practical interest. This includes developing solutions based on the analysis of clinical practice and doctor-patient communication.

Objective: To investigate adaptation and recovery challenges in patients with Kimmerle anomaly following surgical treatment and propose solutions.

Material and methods. The analysis of patients’ post-surgery rehabilitation was conducted. This included patient E.M. Rozanova’s case, who kept a recovery diary, as well as survey data from operated patients.

Results. Main postoperative rehabilitation challenges were identified, i.e., the need to adapt to altered blood flow, psychological difficulties, lack of standardized recovery protocols, and limited access to rehabilitation programs, especially for patients with vestibulo-ataxic syndrome. Proposed solutions include patient questionnaires to develop individualized rehabilitation plans, consultations with psychiatrists and psychologists prior to and following surgery, and the development of specialized physical therapy programs including vestibular exercises and habilitation techniques (e.g., recreational swimming).

Conclusion. Surgical treatment of Kimmerle anomaly requires an integrated rehabilitation approach that takes into account neurological, psychological, and social aspects. Further research and development of clinical guidelines are necessary to improve patients’ quality of life. Proposed measures may accelerate patients’ recovery and minimize their postoperative complications.

1. Lvov I.S., Lukyanchikov V.A., Grin A.A., et al. The frequency of vertebral artery sulcus ossification, grades III and IV, in patients with Kimmerle’s anomaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2022; 122 (9): 37–47 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202212209137.

2. Kulagin V.N., Mikhailyukova S.S., Lantukh A.V., et al. Kimmerle’s anomaly: aspects of diagnostics and treatment of main clinical syndromes. Pacific Medical Journal. 2013; 4: 84–7 (in Russ.).

3. Split W., Sawrasewicz-Rybak M. Character of headache in Kimmerle anomaly. Headache. 2002; 42 (9): 911–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02213.x.

4. Cederberg R.A., Benson B.W., Nunn M., English J.D. Arcuate foramen: prevalence by age, gender, and degree of calcification. Clin Orthodont Res. 2000; 3 (3): 162–7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.30309.x.

5. Larkin V.I., Stelmakh N.S. Course of epilepsy in patients with clinical manifestations of cranio-cerebral imbalance and a low scf-cranial index. Epilepsia i paroksizmal'nye sostoania / Epilepsy and Paroxysmal Conditions. 2018; 10 (3): 38–43 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333.2018.10.3.038-043.

6. Kulagin V.N., Bryukhovetsky I.S., Gulyaev S.A. Clinical and neurophysiological features of nervous system pathology in patients with Kimmerle syndrome. In: Current issues of allergology, pediatrics and pediatric surgery. Vladivostok; 2006: 125–9 (in Russ.).

7. Alekhin E.E., Grin’ A.A., Lukyanchikov V.A., et al. Occurrence of classes III and IV bridges of Kimmerle anomaly. In: Usachev D.Yu., Krylov V.V., Kravets L.Ya. (Eds) X Congress of Neurosurgeons of Russia: collection of abstracts. Nizhny Novgorod; 2024: 41–2. Available at: https://scaf-spb.ru/files/sbornik_tezisov_s_ezd_nejrohirurgov_2024.pdf (in Russ.) (accessed 15.01.2025).

8. Lutsik A.A., Kazantsev V.V. Surgical treatment of patients with cervical spine osteochondrosis. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika / Russian Journal of Spine Surgery. 2008; 4: 24–9 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2008.4.24-29.

9. Chertkov A.K., Klimov M.E., Nesterova M.V. On surgical treatment of patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency associated with Kimmerle anomaly. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika / Russian Journal of Spine Surgery. 2005; 1: 69–73 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.1.69-73.

10. Aliev K.T., Bondarenko E.V., Volkova S.A., et al. Symptomatology of spondylogenic circulatory impairment in the vertebrobasilar basin. The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University. 2012; 19 (1): 60–3 (in Russ.).

11. Eremushkin M.A., Kirzhner B.V., Mochalov A.Yu. Post-isometric muscle relaxation. Saint Petersburg: Nauka i tekhnika; 2021: 288 pp. (in Russ.).

12. Karelina N.N., Balashova E.Yu., Borisova I.V., et al. Prevention of diseases of the cervical spine at the teaching staff of the university by means ofphysical culture. Scientific Notes of P. F. Lesgaft University. 2020; 9: 140–5 (in Russ.).

13. Silkin P.A. Recommendations for the development of physical (functional) data of students in the preparatory department and in junior classes based on the system of Boris Knyazev. Bulletin of the Vaganova Ballet Academy. 2007; 1: 160–82 (in Russ.).

14. Voronov V.A., Demidenko D.Yu., Plokhikh Yu.A., et al. Current aspects of vestibular rehabilitation. Russian Otorhinolaryngology. 2020; 19 (1): 15–8 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18692/1810-4800-2020-1-15-18.

15. Romanova M.V., Kotov S.V., Isakova E.V. Modern approaches to rehabilitation of patients with vestibulo-ataxic disorders. Lechaschi vrach. 2012; 6: 74–7 (in Russ.).

16. Dvurechenskaya V.S., Oleinikova V.V., Khablieva V.V., Tregub P.P. Neurorehabilitation potential of kinesiological activation of the cerebral hemisphere/contralateral limbs axis. Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2024; 17 (4): 447–62 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2404-06.

17. Polyanskaya V.V., Varypaev M.S., Kardasheva A.E., et al. Efficacy of modern rehabilitation methods after stroke. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2024; 102 (7): 485–92 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2024-102-7-485-492.

18. Razumov A.N., Turova E.A., Adilov V.B., et al. Some features of the organization of functioning of resort business in Russia. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2018; 95 (2-2): 106–8 (in Russ.).

19. Lukyanova L.M. Swimming as a means of hydro-rehabilitation of students with disabilities. Nauka-2020. 2020; 4: 19–24 (in Russ.).