Rehabilitation: the result of collaborative efforts among patients, their families, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation team
https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2024.33
Abstract
Rehabilitation is recognized as a complex and comprehensive process that requires active involvement of the patients, their family members and various medical specialists. A successful recovery implies the coordinated efforts among all participants in the rehabilitation process, based on the latest scientific data and clinical experience. The presented article discusses an integrated approach to rehabilitation and emphasizes the significance of productive interaction between patients, their relatives, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams, which includes physicians from various fields, psychologists, social workers, and other professionals. This model of rehabilitation is aimed at achieving maximum restoration of patients' functions and quality of life.
About the Authors
G. K. Bykovshchenko
Sechenov University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgiy K. Bykovshchenko
8/2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
A. N. Bykovshchenko
Konchalovsky City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna N. Bykovshchenko, PhD
2 bldg 1 Kashtanovaya Alleya Str., Zelenograd, Moscow 124489
References
1. Begovich E., Baigalmaa B., Solopova A.G., et al. Quality of life as a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in patients with painful external genital endometriosis. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023; 17 (1): 92–103 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.391.
2. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., et al. Contemporary insights into rehabilitation of cervical cancer patients. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023; 17 (3): 343–56 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.426.
3. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., et al. Algorithm for the provision of comprehensive psychotherapeutic support to women experiencing neuropsychiatric symptoms during rehabilitation following the treatment of malignant neoplasms of the reproductive system. Epilepsia i paroksizmal'nye sostoania / Epilepsy and Paroxysmal Conditions. 2023; 15 (3): 232–45 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2023.168.
4. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., et al. Strengthening rehabilitation for patients with ovarian tumors: current approaches and future directions. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2023; 16 (2): 303–16 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.196.
5. la Cour K., Ledderer L., Hansen H.P. “An Arena for Sharing”: exploring the joint involvement of patients and their relatives in a cancer rehabilitation intervention study. Cancer Nurs. 2015; 38: E1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000149.
6. Neumann-Zielke L. The Family Conference as an example of involving the patient's relatives in neurological early rehabilitation. Rehabilitation. 2003; 42 (1) 3–10 (in German). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-37048.
7. Tanwir S., Montgomery K., Chari V., Nesathurai S. Stroke rehabilitation: availability of a family member as caregiver and discharge destination. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 50 (3): 355–62.
8. Hirano Y., Maeshima S., Osawa A., et al. The effect of voluntary training with family participation on early home discharge in patients with severe stroke at a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Eur Neurol. 2012; 68 (4): 221–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000338478.
9. Santos C., Medeiros A., Gomes R. Involving families in psychiatric treatment and rehabilitation. Eur Psychiatry. 2021; 64 (Suppl. 1): S154–5. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.418.
10. Tuomisto S., Koivula M., Åstedt-Kurki P., Helminen M. Family involvement in rehabilitation: coronary artery disease – patients' perspectives. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27 (15–16): 3020–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14494.
11. Mancini M.A. Considering families in the field of rehabilitation counseling. Rehabil Educ. 2007; 21 (1): 47–62.
12. Hinrichsen G.A., Emery E.E. Interpersonal factors and late-life depression. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2005; 12 (3): 264–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpi027.
13. Scholz U., Doña B.G., Sud S., Schwarzer R. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2002; 18 (3): 242–51. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242.
14. Ha J.F., Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010; 10 (1): 38–43.
15. Tijsen L., Derksen E., Achterberg W., Buijck B. Challenging rehabilitation environment for older patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2019; 14: 1451–60. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S207863.
16. Malmström M., Holst-Hansson A., Olsson Möller U. The complexity of needs and roles of family members during breast cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 2024; 24 (1): 1430. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13200-x.
17. Maggio M.G., Corallo F., De Francesco M., et al. Understanding the family burden and caregiver role in stroke rehabilitation: insights from a retrospective study. Neurol Sci. 2024; 45 (11): 5347–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07668-5.
18. Vahedian-Azimi A., Sanjari M.J., Rahimi-Bashar F., et al. Cardiac rehabilitation using the family-centered empowerment model is effective in improving long-term mortality in patients with myocardial infarction: a 10-year follow-up randomized clinical trial. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024; 31 (2): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00636-2.
19. Horne M., Thomas N., McCabe C., et al. Patient-directed therapy during in-patient stroke rehabilitation: stroke survivors’ views of feasibility and acceptability. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37 (25): 2344–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1024341.
20. Palmer R., Enderby P., Paterson G. Using computers to enable self-management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding: the patient and carer perspective. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013; 48 (5): 508–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12024.
21. Tyson S., Wilkinson J., Thomas N., et al. Phase II pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient-led therapies (mirror therapy and lower-limb exercises) during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29 (9): 818–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314565513.
22. Pollock A.S., Durward B.R., Rowe P.J., Paul J.P. The effect of independent practice of motor tasks by stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16 (5): 473–80. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr520oa.
23. Proot I.M., Crebolder H.F., Abu-Saad H.H., et al. Stroke patients’ needs and experiences regarding autonomy at discharge from nursing home. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 41 (3): 275–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00113-5.
24. Liu K.P.Y., Chan C.C.H. Pilot randomized controlled trial of selfregulation in promoting function in acute poststroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95 (7): 1262–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.018.
25. Loisel P., Durand M., Baril R., et al. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15 (4): 581–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8036-x.
26. Moe A., Brataas H. Interdisciplinary collaboration experiences in creating an everyday rehabilitation model: a pilot study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016; 9: 173–82. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S103696.
27. Hastings M. Team working in rehabilitation. In: Squires A.J., Camplin J. (Eds) Rehabilitation of older people. Springer, Boston, MA; 2002: 105–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2987-7_6.
28. Harris M.F., Advocat J., Crabtree B.F., et al. Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016; 9: 35–46. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S97371.
29. Enderby P. Teamworking in community rehabilitation. J Clin Nurs. 2002; 11 (3): 409–11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00633.x.
30. Neumann V., Gutenbrunner C., Fialka-Moser V., et al. Interdisciplinary team working in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42 (1): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0483.
31. Coxon K. Common experiences of staff working in integrated health and social care organizations: an European perspective. Int J Integrated Care. 2005; 13 (2): 13–21. https://doi.org/0.1108/14769018200500012.
32. Leathard A. Models for interprofessional collaboration. In: Leathard A., Horder J. (Eds) Interprofessional collaboration. From policy to practice in health and social care. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2003: 93–117.
33. Brataas H.V., Haugan N. Employees perspectives on development of interdisciplinarity in new hospital ward. Nordic J Health Res. 2009; 5 (2): 30–45 (in Norwegian).
34.
Review
For citations:
Bykovshchenko G.K., Bykovshchenko A.N. Rehabilitation: the result of collaborative efforts among patients, their families, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. Journal of Medical Rehabilitation. 2024;2(4):395-401. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2024.33
Views:
651
Email this article 