Preview

Journal of Medical Rehabilitation

Advanced search

Non-pharmacological rehabilitation methods for upper limb breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2025.50

Abstract

Background. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper limb is one of the most frequent and disabling complications of treatment, having detrimental effects on the functional status, quality of life and social adaptation of such patients. Despite widespread use of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions, the issues of their comparative effectiveness, optimal combinations and long term outcomes continue to be debatable. An analysis of international guidelines in the context of Russian clinical experience is a relevant research task.

Objective: To carry out a systematic review of scientific publications on non-pharmacological rehabilitation methods for patients with BCRL of the upper limb.

Material and methods. The review was carried out according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature search was conducted across the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PEDro and eLibrary databases and covered the period from 2000 to 2025. The analysis included clinical guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and cohort clinical studies evaluating complete decongestive therapy (CDT), compression therapy, physical exercise, manual lymphatic drainage, kinesio taping, low level laser therapy (LLLT), intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), instrumental physiotherapy and surgical methods. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2, ROBINS I, and AMSTAR 2 tools.

Results. A total of 33 sources were included: clinical guidelines (n=3), systematic reviews and meta-analyses (n=10), randomized controlled trials (n=7), and cohort/prospective studies (n=3), as well as reviews, methodological and clinical works (n=10). CDT has the strongest evidence base and is considered the “gold standard” for BCRL management. Compression therapy is effective for both prevention and remedial treatment. Physical exercise is safe given proper compression and improves functional outcomes. Manual lymphatic drainage is considered effective as a component of CDT. LLLT, kinesio taping, and IPC have a moderate evidence base as adjunctive modalities. Russian studies highlight the potential of instrumental physiotherapy and surgical approaches, although requiring further validation in multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Conclusion. The effectiveness of a multicomponent rehabilitation strategy in BCRL of the upper limb has been confirmed. CDT remains the method of choice, while individualized programs incorporating physical exercise, instrumental techniques and surgical interventions extend treatment opportunities at different stages of the disease. Further multicenter studies are required to clarify optimal combinations, long term outcomes, and cost effectiveness of various approaches.

About the Authors

M. S. Zainulina
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University ; negirev Maternity Hospital No. 6
Russian Federation

Marina S. Zainulina, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.

Scopus Author ID: 37076359000. WoS ResearcherID: B-5746-2018 

6-8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022 

5 Mayakovky Str., Saint Petersburg 190000 



K. I. Zhordaniya
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Kirill I. Zhordaniya, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.  

Scopus Author ID: 6506797842 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 



References

1. Armer J.M., Hulett J.M., Bernas M., et al. Best-practice guidelines in assessment, risk reduction, management, and surveillance for postbreast cancer lymphedema. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013; 5: 134–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-013-0105-0.

2. Davies C., Levenhagen K., Ryans K., et al. Interventions for breast cancer-related lymphedema: clinical practice guideline from the academy of oncologic physical therapy of APTA. Phys Ther. 2020; 100 (7): 1163–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa087.

3. McLaughlin S.A., DeSnyder S.M., Klimberg S., et al. Considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert ASBrS Panel. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24 (9): 2827–35. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5964-6.

4. McLaughlin S.A., Wright M.J., Morris K.T., et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 5213–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3725.

5. Cheng H., Gong J., Yu L., et al. Compression sleeves for prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2026; 215: 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07846-9.

6. Devoogdt N., Christiaens M.R., Geraerts I., et al. Effect of manual lymph drainage in addition to guidelines and exercise therapy on arm lymphedema related to breast cancer: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5326. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5326.

7. Shamoun S., Ahmad M. Complete decongestive therapy effect on breast cancer related to lymphedema: a systemic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023; 24 (7): 2225–38. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.7.2225.

8. Ermoshchenkova M.V., Myasnikova M.O., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., et al. Surgical rehabilitation of women with upper limb postmastectomy lymphedema. RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie / Russian Medical Inquiry. 2023; 7 (6): 372–82 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32364/2587-6821-2023-7-6-6.

9. Konchugova T.V., Apkhanova T.V., Kulchitskaya D.B., et al. Current aspects of medical rehabilitation of patients with cancer related lymphedema of extremities: a narrative review. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2024; 23 (1): 66–76 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2024-23-1-66-76.

10. Ovchinnikova I.V., Gimranov A.M., Busygin M.A., et al. Surgical prevention of upper limb lymphedema in the treatment of breast cancer using the LYMPHA technique. Malignant Tumors. 2023; 13 (3S1): 116–7 (in Russ.).

11. Vorobyov A.Yu., Poluboyarinova I.A., Davydova L.M. Prevention and early diagnosis of lymphedema of the upper limb after treatment of breast cancer: guidelines. Мoscow; 2021 (in Russ.).

12. Vorotnikov V.V., Pakhomova R.A., Gugnina A.S., et al. Preventive microsurgical intervention in breast cancer. Malignant Tumors. 2023; 13 (3s1): 18–24 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s1-18-24.

13. Kurbatov G.K., Lazarev A.F., Bochkarev A.P. Comprehensive physical antiedematous therapy in the treatment of upper limb lymphostasis. Russian Journal of Oncology. 2018; 23 (2): 82–3 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1028-9984-2018-23-2-82-83.

14. Pedder V.V., Mironenko V.N., Kosenok V.K., et al. Preconditions of application of prelymphatic noninvasive thermo- and ozone/ NO-ultrasonic method in patients with breast cancer arm lymphedema rehabilitation. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2010; 1 (94): 162–7 (in Russ.).

15. Sidorov D.B., Grushina T.I. The effectiveness of the use of preformed physical factors and subcutaneous surgical correction in the rehabilitation of patients with breast cancer with late lymphedema. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019; 6: 39–44 (in Russ.).

16. Lyman G.H., Temin S., Edge S.B., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 7703–20. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.08.001.

17. Baxter G.D., Liu L., Petrich S., et al. Low level laser therapy (photobiomodulation therapy) for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17: 833. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3852-x.

18. Huang T.W., Tseng S.H., Lin C.C., et al. Effects of manual lymphatic drainage on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2013; 11: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-15.

19. Lin Y., Yang Y., Zhang X., et al. Manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022; 22 (5): e664– 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2022.01.013.

20. Keskin D., Dalyan M., Ünsal-Delialioğlu S., Düzlü-Öztürk Ü. The results of the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy and the determination of predictive factors for response to treatment in patients with breast cancer related-lymphedema. Cancer Rep. 2020; 3 (2): e1225. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1225.

21. Hou S., Li Y., Lu W., et al. Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical studies. Gland Surg. 2024; 13 (8): 1358–69. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-123.

22. Pajero Otero V., García Delgado E., Martín Cortijo C., et al. Intensive complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression versus Kinesio taping for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: randomized cross-over trial. Eur J Cancer Care. 2022; 31 (6): e13665. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13625.

23. Jeffs E., Ream E., Taylor C., et al. Clinical effectiveness of decongestive treatments on excess arm volume and patient-centered outcomes in women with early breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2018; 16 (2): 453–506. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003185.

24. Mahmood D., Ahmad A., Sharif F., et al. Clinical application of low-level laser therapy (photo-biomodulation therapy) in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2022; 22: 937. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10021-8.

25. Konchugova T.V., Apkhanova T.V., Styazhkina E.M., et al. The role of therapeutic exercise in the rehabilitation of patients with postmastectomy upper limb lymphedema (a contemporary perspective) (literature review). Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2024; 31 (4): 141–8 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1609-2163-2024-4-131-138.

26. Kasparov B.S., Semiglazova T.Yu., Kovlen D.V., et al. Scientometric analysis of evidence-based studies on physical factors in breast cancer patients rehabilitation. Malignant Tumors. 2018; 8 (3S1): 50–5 (in Russ.).

27. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

28. Skwiot M. Effectiveness of kinesio taping for lymphedema in the postmastectomy patient: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2025; 14 (5): 1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051700.

29. Blom K.Y., Johansson K.I., Nilsson-Wikmar L.B., Brogårdh C.B. Early intervention with compression garments prevents progression in mild breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Oncologica. 2022; 61 (7): 897–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2081932.

30. Schmitz K.H., Ahmed R.L., Troxel A., et al. Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. New Engl J Med. 2009; 361 (7): 664–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0810118.

31. Shamsesfandabadi P., Gergley J.C., Petrie N.L., et al. Resistance training and lymphedema in breast cancer survivors. JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8 (6): e2514765. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14765.

32. Buchan J., Janda M., Box R., et al. A randomized trial on the effect of exercise mode on breast cancer-related lymphedema. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 48 (10): 1866–74. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000988.

33. Bundred N.J., Barrett E., Todd C., et al. Prevention of lymphoedema after axillary clearance by external compression sleeves PLACE randomised trial results. Effects of high BMI. Cancer Med. 2023; 12 (5): 5506–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5378.

34. Nadal Castells M.J., Ramirez Mirabal E., Cuartero Archs J., et al. Effectiveness of lymphedema prevention programs with compression garment after lymphatic node dissection in breast cancer: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021; 2: 727256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.727256.

35. Kuzmanović M., Mustur D. Effects of 4-week complex decongestive therapy in the management of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema in montenegrin women post-mastectomy and chemo/ radiotherapy. Healthcare. 2025; 13 (20): 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202596.

36. Selcuk Yilmaz S., Ayhan F.F. The randomized controlled study of low-level laser therapy, kinesio-taping and manual lymphatic drainage in patients with stage II breast cancer-related lymphedema. Eur J Breast Health. 2023; 19 (1): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-6-4.

37. Myasnikova M.O. Postmastectomy lymphedema of the upper limbs: possibilities of conservative treatment. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2007; 9 (3): 30–2 (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Zainulina M.S., Zhordaniya K.I. Non-pharmacological rehabilitation methods for upper limb breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Rehabilitation. 2025;3(4):242-251. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2025.50

Views: 43

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5873 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5881 (Online)