Intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic therapy in rehabilitation of patients with post-COVID syndrome
https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2025.53
Abstract
Over five years have passed since the COVID-19 outbreak, but the rehabilitation of coronavirus patients still remains a highly relevant issue. In the search for new rehabilitation approaches, researchers have turned their attention to intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic therapy (IHHT) as a means of restoring impaired physical and psychological body reserves. IHHT promotes comprehensive recovery by modulating metabolic and immune processes as well as antioxidant defenses. Numerous clinical studies indicate the potential of this rehabilitation modality, which is supported by its efficacy, safety, and the preservation of achieved effects for three to six months. The reviewed publications report the IHHT effectiveness in patients with combined pathology. However, a number of identified limitations currently prevents this method from being scaled up to the level of standard rehabilitation protocols, which, together with the existing body of evidence, raises the need for a large multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IHHT in patients with post‑COVID syndrome of varying severity.
About the Authors
I. Yu. TorshinRussian Federation
Ivan Yu. Torshin, PhD
44 corp. 2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333
WoS ResearcherID: C-7683-2018
Scopus Author ID: 7003300274
A. G. Chuchalin
Russian Federation
Alexander G. Chuchalin, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof., Academician of RAS
16 Pervaya Leonov Str., Moscow 129226
O. A. Gromova
Russian Federation
Olga A. Gromova, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.
44 corp. 2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333
WoS ResearcherID: J-4946-2017
Scopus Author ID: 7003589812
References
1. Filip R., Gheorghita Puscaselu R., Anchidin-Norocel L., et al. Global challenges to public health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of pandemic measures and problems. J Pers Med. 2022; 12 (8): 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081295.
2. Zangrillo A., Gattinoni L. Learning from mistakes during the pandemic: the Lombardy lesson. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46 (8): 1622–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06137-9.
3. Ghosh S., Raghunath M., Sinha J.K. Navigating the commonality of healthcare failures: COVID-19 and conflict zones. Cureus. 2023; 15 (12): e50668. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50668.
4. Raphela T.D. Resilience and preparedness of hospitals for pandemics: lessons learned from COVID-19. Jamba. 2024; 16 (2): 1804. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1804.
5. Liu Y., Funk S., Flasche S. The contribution of pre-symptomatic infection to the transmission dynamics of COVID-2019. Wellcome Open Res. 2020; 5: 58. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15788.1.
6. Gao W., Lv J., Pang Y., Li L.M. Role of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic infections in covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2021; 375: n2342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2342.
7. Marshall-Andon T., Walsh S., Berger-Gillam T., Pari A.A.A. Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Integr Healthc J. 2023; 4 (1): e000100. https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100.
8. Décary S., De Groote W., Arienti C., et al. Scoping review of rehabilitation care models for post COVID-19 condition. Bull World Health Organ. 2022; 100 (11): 676–88. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.22.288105.
9. Manhas K.P., O’Connell P., Krysa J., et al. Development of a novel care rehabilitation pathway for post-COVID conditions (long COVID) in a provincial health system in Alberta, Canada. Phys Ther. 2022; 102 (9): pzac090. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzac090.
10. van der Feltz-Cornelis C., Heightman M., Allsopp G. Learning from long COVID: integrated care for multiple long-term conditions. Br J Gen Pract. 2023; 73 (730): 196–7. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp23X732561.
11. Рубрикатор клинических рекомендаций. Коронавирусная инфекция COVID-19. 2025. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/1024_1 (дата обращения 02.09.2025). Rubricator of clinical guidelines. Coronavirus infection COVID-19. 2025. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/1024_1 (in Russ.) (accessed 02.09.2025).
12. McClelland R.D., Lin Y.C.J., Culp T.N., et al. The domestication of SARS-CoV-2 into a seasonal infection by viral variants. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1289387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1289387.
13. da Costa V.G., Saivish M.V., Santos D.E.R., et al. Comparative epidemiology between the 2009 H1N1 influenza and COVID-19 pandemics. J Infect Public Health. 2020; 13 (12): 1797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.023.
14. Kanorskii S.G. Post-COVID syndrome: prevalence, organ pathogenesis and routes of correction. A systematic review. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2021; 28 (6): 90–116 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2021-28-6-90-116.
15. Carfì A., Bernabei R., Landi F., et al. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020; 324 (6): 603–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12603.
16. Tenforde M.W., Kim S.S., Lindsell C.J., et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network – United States, March–June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69 (30): 993–8. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6930e1.
17. Carvalho-Schneider C., Laurent E., Lemaignen A., et al. Follow-up of adults with noncritical COVID-19 two months after symptom onset. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021; 27 (2): 258–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.052.
18. Chopra V., Flanders S.A., O’Malley M., et al. Sixty-day outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Ann Intern Med. 2021; 174 (4): 576–8. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-5661.
19. Halpin S.J., McIvor C., Whyatt G., et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a crosssectional evaluation. J Med Virol. 2021; 93 (2): 1013–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26368.
20. Sk Abd Razak R., Ismail A., Abdul Aziz A.F., et al. Post-COVID syndrome prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24 (1): 1785. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19264-5.
21. Arjun M.C., Singh A.K., Pal D., et al. Characteristics and predictors of long COVID among diagnosed cases of COVID-19. PLoS One. 2022; 17 (12): e0278825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278825.
22. Kim Y., Bitna-Ha, Kim S.W., et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in patients after 12 months from COVID-19 infection in Korea. BMC Infect Dis. 2022; 22 (1): 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07062-6.
23. McElvaney O.J., McEvoy N.L., McElvaney O.F., et al. Characterization of the inflammatory response to severe COVID-19 illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 202 (6): 812–21. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202005-1583OC.
24. Tang N., Li D., Wang X., Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18 (4): 844–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14768.
25. Hu B., Guo H., Zhou P., Shi Z.L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021; 19 (3): 141–54. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41579-020-00459-7.
26. Lu R., Zhao X., Li J., et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020; 395 (10224): 565–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8.
27. Shang J., Ye G., Shi K., et al. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020; 581 (7807): 221–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y.
28. Inoue S., Hatakeyama J., Kondo Y., et al. Post-intensive care syndrome: its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directions. Acute Med Surg. 2019; 6 (3): 233–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.415.
29. Hosey M.M., Needham D.M. Survivorship after COVID-19 ICU stay. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020; 6 (1): 60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0201-1.
30. Gutzeit J., Weiß M., Nürnberger C., et al. Definitions and symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome: an updated systematic umbrella review. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025; 275 (1): 129–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01868-y.
31. Petrova M.S. Comprehensive approach to rehabilitation of patients with COVID-19. (A literature review). Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024; 101 (3): 48–55 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort202410103148.
32. Jimeno-Almazán A., Franco-López F., Buendía-Romero Á., et al. Rehabilitation for post-COVID-19 condition through a supervised exercise intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022; 32 (12): 1791–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14240.
33. Lasynova G.Kh., Lakman I.A., Gareeva D.F., et al. Rehabilitation of COVID-19 convalescents and its impact on cardiovascular endpoints: propensity score matching analysis. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023; 28 (4S): 5630 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5630.
34. Zaletova T.S. Interval hypoxic therapy in cardiology and dietetics. Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied Research. 2022; 4: 32–4 (in Russ.).
35. Miryutova N.F., Gruzdeva D.A. Hyperbaric oxygenation in rehabilitation medicine: application, action mechanisms, and effectiveness. Reabilitologia / Journal of Medical Rehabilitation. 2025; 3 (1): 36–50 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2025.38.
36. Cannellotto M., Yasells García A., Landa M.S. Hyperoxia: effective mechanism of hyperbaric treatment at mild-pressure. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25 (2): 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020777.
37. Miziev I.A., Makhov M.Kh., Sabanchieva Zh.Kh., et al. Assessment of the direct influence of normobaric interval hypoxic training on the subjective state of patients with chronic prostatitis. Glavnyy vrach Yuga Rossii. 2025; 2: 44–8 (in Russ.).
38. Ilyina A.A., Petrova M.V., Ilyin D.V., et al. Application of intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia therapy in clinical practice: perspectives for use in neurorehabilitation (literature review). Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2025; 22 (6): 128–37 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-6-128-137.
39. Ivanova G.E., Suvorov A.U., Bushkova J.V., et al. Normobaric interval hypoxia-hyperoxic therapy (ihht) in the process of medical rehabilitation of patients after stroke. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018; 3: 115–22 (in Russ.).
40. Orlova E.V., Lyamina N.P., Skorobogatyth N.V., Pogonchenkova I.V. Interval hypoxic-hyperoxic therapy in complex rehabilitation of patients with osteoarthritis. Practical Medicine. 2022; 20 (4): 81–4 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32000/2072-1757-2022-4-81-84.
41. Lyamina N.P., Orlova E.V., Skorobogatyth N.V., Ksenofontova I.V. Individually dosed hypoxy-hyperoxytherapy in rehabilitation programs for cardiac patients with multimorbid pathology. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2022; 99 (5-2): 37–8 (in Russ.).
42. Orlova E.V., Lyamina N.P., Skorobogatyth N.V., Ksenofontova I.V. Efficiency of interval hypoxia-hyperoxytherapy in the rehabilitation of patients with nonspecific musculosceletal low back pain: results of а randomized placebo-controlled study. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2024; 6 (2): 98–108 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab630118.
43. Andreeva A.V., Yakushin S.S. Influence of interval hypoxi-hyperoxic training at the rehabilitation process in elderly patients with myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure (preliminary results). Therapy. 2025; 11 (3): 71–80 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2025.3.71-80.
44. Glazachev O.S., Kryzhanovskaya S.Y., Zapara M.A., et al. Safety and efficacy of intermittent hypoxia conditioning as a new rehabilitation/ secondary prevention strategy for patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021; 17 (6): e051121193317. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X17666210514005235.
45. Tuter D.S., Kopylov P.Y., Syrkin A.L., et al. Intermittent systemic hypoxic–hyperoxic training for myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: first results from a singlecentre, randomised controlled trial. Open Heart. 2018; 5 (2): e000891. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000891.
46. Glazachev O., Kopylov P., Susta D., et al. Adaptations following an intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia training in coronary artery disease patients: a controlled study. Clin Cardiol. 2017; 40 (6): 370–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22670.
47. Orlova E., Lyamina N., Pogonchenkova I., Skorobogatykh N. Pos1453 interval hypoxic-hyperoxic training in rehabilitation of patients with osteoarthritis and post-covid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022; 81 (Suppl. 1): 1071. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3861.
48. Orlova E.V., Lyamina N.P., Skorobogatyth N.V., Pogonchenkova I.V. Сlinical efficacy of individually dosed intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxic therapy in osteoarthritis patients with post-covid syndrome. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 21 (2): 6–16 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-2-6-16.
49. Doehner W., Fischer A., Alimi B., et al. Intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic training during inpatient rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and functional outcome in patients with long covid: results of a controlled clinical pilot trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024; 15 (6): 2781–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13628.
50. Volovets S.A., Tsyganova T.N., Badalov N.G. The effectiveness of hypohyperoxic training in the medical rehabilitation of patients who have undergone COVID-19. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation. 2022; 21 (1): 35–46 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/rjpbr109501.
51. Lyamina N.P., Lyamina S.V., Skorobogatyth N.V., et al. Controlled hypoxia-hyperoxytherapy as a component of a targeted approach in the rehabilitation of patients with multimorbidity: a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective study. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2023; 5 (4): 279–88 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab608182.
52. Kapel J.S., Stokholm R., Elmengaard B., et al. Individualized algorithmbased intermittent hypoxia improves quality of life in patients suffering from long-term sequelae after COVID-19 infection. J Clin Med. 2025; 14 (5): 1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051590.
53. Al-Sunaa R.S. Individually dosed hypoxi-hyperoxicous therapy as an innovative method of rehabilitation of patients with post-COVID syndrome. Science and Sports: Modern Trends. 2025; 13 (2): 8–13 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36028/2308-8826-2025-13-2-8-13.
54. Karelova N.Yu., Poddubny D.V., Larina A.V. Enhancing patient rehabilitation post-coronavirus pneumonia through individually dosed normobaric interval hypoxic hyperoxygenation therapy. Bulleten medicinskoj nauki. 2024; 2: 91–6 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31684/25418475-2024-2-91.
55. Reuner M., Krehbiel J., Rech J., et al. Utilization frequency and patientreported effectiveness of symptomatic therapies in post-COVID syndrome. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24 (1): 2577. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19951-3.
56. Bralyuk M.A., Akinina E.G., Voronova O.A. Analysis of the results of using normobaric interval hypoxic-hyperoxic training in patients with postCOVID syndrome. Glavnyy vrach Yuga Rossii. 2022; 1: 37–40 (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Torshin I.Yu., Chuchalin A.G., Gromova O.A. Intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic therapy in rehabilitation of patients with post-COVID syndrome. Journal of Medical Rehabilitation. 2025;3(3):200-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2025.53
JATS XML

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






















